![]() This is in contrast to "BackBlaze" and other such services which average $5/month per backed up user for the rest of your life. No monthly fees except what your cloud provider charges. You can back up as many computers, users and internal or external hard drives as you want. Choose a strong password and you're safe! Full encryption so that only you can recover the files. So you can choose exactly the storage plan you need. Supports all major cloud storage providers. Open file format and open-source tools exist for decrypting backups, so you are never stranded with proprietary backups that can't be recovered if a company goes out of business. ![]() Uses the "commit history" concept from Git to do extremely safe and stable backups, with full revision histories. Extremely well architected and efficient. And yes it backs up your home folder by default but you can add other folders and drives too. Let me know if you have more questions.Īrq is totally incredible. To me hourly is more that I need and IMO just racks up storage space for unnecessary versioning. That give me plenty of versioning going back a few months. So that gives me about 46GB on S3 (140/3 cents a GB=46). I have about 30GB of user data on S3 with Arq and I set the Arq purge budget at $1.40. five dollars a month for Amazon Cloud Drive. Heck even if you allowed S3 to store 2X the data you have for versioning, it would only cost you less than one dollar a month vs. ![]() If you really only have around 14GB of user data, Amazon S3 would be much cheaper for you. It also does a monthly file verification similar to checksum. Like you discovered, Arq does versioning. It cannot be viewed like you can view files on something like Dropbox for example.ĥ. Arq breaks up your data into encrypted blocks and sends it to the backup server. The Arq documentation has a section on how to do that.Ĥ. You would first need to reinstall the OS, then you could restore your personal data using Arq. Due to Arq not not using Checksum, I wonder if it would be beneficial to use Arq's versioning? (Note: After 5 hourly backups since using Arq, it seems it's using versioning on it's own.) If so, would Amazon's Cloud Drive unlimited storage option be the best option based on cost bases or Amazon S3 or other options Arq offers? Is it recommended to use Arq to backup hourly, daily or weekly? Also, how long should I keep these versions?Īny other opinions, advice, knowledge I should know?ģ. I intend for Carbon Copy Cloner's Checksum feature to provide an early warning of possible corruption and preventing the copying of corrupted data to other backup solutions. I use Carbon Copy Cloner with Checksum once a month. However, I want to reduce the risk of data corruption. I also never have the urge to return to a prior version of OS. I never delete data that should not have been deleted. With that said, I would prefer to use Arq's versioning to mimic Time Machine. Please, respect the this decision and leave it at that. Is this normal? Is it due to the encryption? Essentially, I'm unable to view a picture or document.ĥ.) I don't use Time Machine. Except, the backup is quite different than I had expected. Does this seem normal?ģ.) How does Arq operate? If I needed to restore from backups, would I need to install the OS or is the OS apart of the backup or would I need to install OS then restore?Ĥ.) Before viewing the backup on Amazon Cloud Drive, I envisioned that I would be able to view files, pictures, etc. Though Amazon Cloud Drive shows 1.4 GB of storage while the first backup 14.003 GB according to Arq's log. However, I did choose "Exclude items skipped by time machine" Is this sufficient for backup of data?Ģ.) I use 37.7 GB of 256 GB on Macintosh HD. Now I have many questions and I need more understanding.ġ.) Arq defaulted to the backup location of "user/name" or the technical term 'Home Folder' with the iconic image of a home. One thing lead to another, I entered the Amazon Prime account information and automatically began backing up. Then I found Amazon is offering unlimited cloud storage for 3 months on Amazon Drive. Mainly, I wanted to see the UI of the application but didn't want to actually backup data until I had more understanding. Suddenly, I began downloading Arq's application due to it being free for 30 days. Arq immediately seemed to be an excellent solution. Typically I don't make rash decisions, except in this situation. Since I do not have an online backup solution, I began searching. Note: I would post this thread in Mac Apps and Mac App Store, but I feel as if those members here in the Mac Basics and Help would be of more help in this topic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |